Sunday
Aug072011

Weekend Box Office: August 5-7

Courtesy of Box Office Mojo:

1.  Rise of the Planet of the Apes - $54 million

2.  The Smurfs - $21 million

3.  Cowboys & Aliens - $15.7 million

4.  The Change-Up - $13.5 million

5.  Captain America: The First Avenger - $13 million

6.  Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2 - $12.16 million

7.  Crazy, Stupid, Love. - $12.1 million

8.  Friends With Benefits - $4.7 million

9.  Horribile Bosses - $4.6 million

10.  Transformers: Dark of the Moon - $3 million

All right...raise your monkey paw if you saw this one coming.

Dismissed not too long ago as the prequel no one asked for, Rise of the Planet of the Apes shocked audiences by being well, good.  Surprsingly good, actually.  The critics thought so, and audiences did too, turning up at theaters in droves this weekend to carry the film an estimated $54 million at the US box office.  That's well beyond the $35 million that Fox had their fingers crossed hoping they would get, and now ranks as the fifth highest-grossing August opening all time. 

As expected, since this is a prequel to a film franchise that ended more than 30 years ago (not counting Tim Burton's 2001 remake, and honestly, who does?), more than half the audience that saw the film this weekend was over 25 years old, and 20% was over 50.  Rise of the Planet of the Apes also received an excellent "A-" from Cinemascore, and with virtually no competition heading into theaters for awhile, it should play well for the rest of the summer.

Ryan Reynolds could have used some genetically-engineered apes in his own film this weekend:  The Change-Up, this weekend's other new release, flopped, landing in fourth place with just $13.5 million.  That's behind The Smurfs, which earned another $21 million in its second weekend, and it even lags behind last weekend's dud, Cowboys & Aliens, which dropped 57% to earn just $15.7 million.  It hasn't been a good summer for Reynolds, as June's Green Lantern also failed to set the box office on fire.

Captain America, in the meantime, inches closer to Thor's $145 million domestic total, earning $13 million this weekend to bring its total US earnings to $143 million.  At this point, it's likely to surpass Thor at some point this week.  Worldwide, however, Thor remains the clear winner, with $447 million worldwide compared to Cap's $246 million.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2 passed another box office milestone this weekend, overtaking The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King to become the third highest-grossing film worldwide.  Deathly Hallows' worldwide box office take now stands at $1.134 billion.  Domestically, the film has earned $342 million, and should mercifully surpass the god-awful Transformers: Dark of the Moon's $344 million by next weekend to become 2011's highest-grossing film.

Next weekend brings the releases of Final Destination 5, and 30 Seconds or Less.  Summer is truly winding down.  Bring on the fall movies!

Sunday
Aug072011

REVIEW: Gainsbourg (Vie Heroique)

Gainsbourg (vie heroique) gained much attention for not only becoming the first film ever to tell the story of France’s legendary rebel named Serge Gainsbourg on the big screen, but also accomplishing it in such unconventional manner that it appears questionable whether the film can be categorized as anything that matches the standards of a biopic.

The cinematic debut of Joan Sfar, a famous comics creator from Europe, may split its audience in two parties by his venture to approach the long-existing idea of a movie about the French cult of the last century through a rather risky exposure of the protagonist’s inner world and personal life, rather than going the traditional route of aiming at exploration of his career’s rises and falls and the public image his persona represented in society.

Those, who are looking forward to the thorough examining of the true events in the tumultuous life of a rowdy celebrity, will be left unsatisfied from the opening scene to the final credits of an over-two-hour observation of Serge’s continuous love affairs and interactions with his illusions from childhood imagination.

Nevertheless, the film apparently doesn’t lose much from its inconsistency with the real life of Gainsbourg, as it still succeeds to build connection between Gainsbourg and us, between his reality and ours, thus it is not surprising if you find yourself wondering what turn the story will take after the first fifteen minutes.

Sfar’s choice to focus his entire film on personal concerns of Gainsbourg may be applauded by ones and criticized by others. The man, whose name is behind some of the most controversial songs of the last century, was notorious for his outrageous attitude on stage and inadmissible statements addressed to those in power.

Aside from the scene involving Gainsbourg’s dispute with the right-wing war veterans in the last act, all this is barely even mentioned in Sfar’s movie. Although it would be certainly delightful to have a whole movie about the thrilling conflict between Gainsbourg and society and between his songs and publicity, Sfar’s movie proves that the personal life of the rowdy, yet talented and clever artist is also tremendously fascinating to watch.

Without any doubt, the movie strongly stands on the phenomenal acting, which quickly sells the story and convinces in its credibility. The lead actor, Eric Elmosnino, precisely implements every peculiar movement, every eccentric gesture and every unique face expression of Serge Gainsbourg to the degree, at which it becomes impossible to discern the actor in his role and question the embodiment of Gainsbourg on the screen.

Elmosnino completely disappears, giving the breath to the iconic figure in French music to have just one leap from the past to the present days and take advantage over another chance to sing seducing songs to his gorgeous women and handle queer conversations with the surreal La Guele, well-performed by the common man behind the mask, Doug Jones. The grandiose acting of the cast splendidly balances with Sfar’s surreal visuals and transiently flowing narrative.

However, the film’s title Gainsbourg (vie heroique), translated as Gainsbourg: A Heroic Life, may cause confusion among many. Such title would be appropriate to the film about an artist, who was fighting for the truths he believed in, which was well-depicted in Gainsbourg’s argument with veterans of the war in Algeria regarding the actual meaning of the lyrics of the French national anthem, La Marseillaise. On the contrary, Sfar’s vie heroique implies the story of an unattractive man, whose talent is personified by his own hyperbole and whose dirty songs about lollipops have brought such beautiful and elegant ladies as Brigitte Bardot and Jane Birkin to his bed.

The question that may be whirling in one’s mind throughout the whole movie is “What was so great about this guy that turned him into a national idol?”. Every French person knows the answer to this question even prior to the beginning of the film, while every foreigner will leave theatre still asking this question until he looks up in the Internet or encyclopedia. A Heroic Life runs for over two hours, but never really reveals what was so heroic about Serge Gainsbourg.

Joan Sfar’s movie is ingenious in its delivery of the story, similarly to Steven Soderbergh’s Kafka and Todd Haynes’s I’m Not There. Its charming and unusual visual style and excellent acting contribute to the film’s distinction from others in its genre. The film is far from being anything like a detailed and reliable guide in exploring Serge Gainsbourg’s biography and the answer that would explain the prominence of his role in French culture and music.

Nonetheless, it is an entertaining journey throughout his private life, which discloses some truths of Gainsbourg’s nature and the way he was when not on stage. Gainsbourg (vie heroique) represents a sea one should cautiously swim in when discovering the deepness of Gainsbourg’s inner world, not a surface to confidently walk upon while investigating the reality that surrounded the protagonist.

Sunday
Aug072011

Kate Beckinsale On The Total Recall Set Plus A Vid of Hovercar Stunt

The new adaption of Phillip K Dick's "We can remember it for you wholesale" Aka Total Recall is about halfway through shooting in Vancouver, over the last week they have embarked on a 15 day shoot of a big hovercar chase, that's twice as long as it takes to do a standard action sequence.

Below are pics of Kate Beckinsale as Lori, an agent and fake wife of Quaid (Colin Farrell). In the Arnie movie the role was played by Sharon Stone and she was actually the girlfriend of Richter (Michael Ironside) who was the man that hunted Quaid once the shit hit the fan, however I get the feeling that character has been merged into Lori and she will be doing the chasing.

Also below we have a vid of another stunt with the hovercar that Quaid uses, only instead of being pulled around on rigs, it's being pulled vertically and Quaid is hanging on top of it, I can't be sure if that is Farrell doing the stunt himself or not.

Sunday
Aug072011

A Quick, Opinionated Take on 'The Dark Knight Rises'

Over the past week or two I've been reading a lot of internet chatter about what people think of The Dark Knight Rises, being filmed right now with everyone to see in Pittsburgh.

"Why is Batman fighting in the daytime?"

"What's with the football game?"

"Why are the Pittsburgh Steelers gonna be in the movie?"

These questions ultimately lead people to thinking the film will suck.  Why you ask?  Well everyone's last glimpse of Batman came in The Dark Knight, the best comic book movie of all-time.  Everyone compares what they see being filmed to that movie.  But I think everyone is making the wrong assumption about this film:  This is not The Dark Knight 2!

Just because the film has The Dark Knight in the title, does not mean it's gonna be the exact same movie.  Go back and watch Batman Begins and The Dark Knight together.  Yes, they have the same characters and everything but do the films really share any similarities besides that?  From the film's style, to tone, to cinematography, one is different from the other.  With that, I think everyone keeps thinking The Dark Knight Rises will look just like The Dark Knight did.  No it won't.

This is Christopher Nolan were talking about here.  He changes his style for each film.  Why would he want to repeat what he's already done?  He wants to make a different style film with The Dark Knight Rises, otherwise, why else would he bother?

So next time you spoil yourself and view pics or a video from the set of The Dark Knight Rises and are saying to yourself, "Well that doesn't look right...That wouldn't fit with The Dark Knight."  Just remember:

It's NOT The Dark Knight.

Sunday
Aug072011

THINK TWICE: DOES THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN (2012) DESERVE TO BE GIVEN A CHANCE? PART III

Similarly to Batman Bagins and X-Men: First Class, The Amazing Spider-Man has a chance to become a new masterpiece in the genre of comic book movies, in spite of all the concerns it is currently facing. These include complaints regarding “extreme dark and somber tone” and “Twilight look”, conceived by both fans and general audience to be initiated by Sony for the pure sake of fitting new trends and fashion after the enormous success of The Dark Knight and The Twilight Saga.

However, in reality, judging by the recent official teaser and Comic-Con footage can be described as nothing, but a contemporary, naturalistic, grounded and serious take on Spider-Man. If Sam Raimi’s concept was to introduce us to the world of Spider-Man, the premise of Marc Webb’s movie is to place the protagonist in our reality, in the modern world. In fact, aside from already mentioned The Dark Knight, Spider-Man 3 was the real attempt to be “dark and dreary”, not only visually, but story-wise as well. This certainly has a great effect on all the visual attributes of the film, from Peter’s hair style to the excessive use of practical stunts in action scenes.

The latter seems the most appropriate in the contrast to Raimi’s continual reliance on CGI to the degree of its complete exploitation and overuse. From the time set photos spread throughout the net, it has become apparent that the new film will use practical effects and real life stunts, filmed with RED Epic camera, in order to make audience believe that this is happening here and now, in our world. Noteworthy, Webb did use visual effects and CGI, when executing the Lizard’s presence and shooting scenes from the first person’s POV to maximize the feeling of what it’s actually like to swing around skyscrapers, hundreds of feet above the ground.

Regarding Peter Parker’s appearance in the new movie, it’s safe to assume that what could define a typical look of a nerd in the 60s has little to do with today’s understanding of the term and style. Peter doesn’t need greasy sleek hair, big glasses and formal clothes to show off as a nerd. Today, stereotypes have merged to the point, at which nerds, just like many others, can have interests in skateboarding and prefer to blow their hair, which actually dates back to the last century’s fashion, started by James Dean and Elvis Presley.

What really can distinguish Peter from others and stress his true self is his behavior and speech. In addition, Webb commented on the protagonist’s nature by implying that the protagonist’s characterization will certainly stress him as an outcast in his his community, rather than just a nerd. As Webb discusses:

"Nerds are running the world. Andrew Garfield made a movie [called "The Social Network"] about it. Nerds are no longer pariahs and knowing how to write computer code is longer a [mocked] quality.What was important in those early comics was this notion that Peter Parker is an outsider and how we define that in a contemporary context. That, I think, was one of the challenges for us — getting Peter Parker’s outsider status to be current. Peter Parker is a real kid. He’s not a billionaire. He’s not an alien. He’s a kid who gets picked on and gets shoved to the outside. The 90-pound weakling, that’s who Spider-Man is when he gets bit. So much of the DNA of the character is the fact that he was a kid when he got bit. He is imperfect, he is immature and has a bit of a punk rock instinct. In his soul he’s still a 90-pound weakling even after [the transformative bite]."

These words also shed the light on Webb’s decision in introduce new Spider-Man with as a separate ego from Peter Parker, instead of positioning it as Peter's extension. The previous movies were notable for their exploration of particularly Spider-Man’s villains, allowing them to possess more than two dimensions and providing actors with rich material to develop from.

In contrast, the protagonist himself was always limited to only Peter Parker and Peter Parker in the costume of Spider-Man, leaving out the opportunity for his alter-ego to shine and take the pride of his own persona. In comics, if Peter was always depicted as a shy, modest and anxious person, Spider-Man, on the other hand, would simply delight in using his wit and sarcasm as both a weapon to distract his enemies and a button to effectively push up self-confidence. When putting his mask on, Peter naturally vanishes to give freedom to Spider-Man, the person he wants to be when beating criminals and saving innocents. As proven by the footage from Comic-Con, this time Spider-Man won’t be silent, but wisecracking and skillful at shooting words at foes. 

The Amazing Spider-Man is the second film for Marc Webb after his debut (500) Days of Summer, which was critically acclaimed as one of the most ingenious romantic films of these days, as well as a magnificent coming-of-age story, beuatifully told with the usage of a rich visual style and imposing acting. Aside from so many options of young candidates and objects of attraction in today's Hollywood, Marc Webb chose Andrew Garfield, a British rising star, to play the role of Peter Parker/Spider-Man.

Garfield is known for not only being a big fan of the superhero, who can endlessly talk about the character, but also one of the most talented representatives of the new generation of actors. As an actor, Garfield proves his chameleonic ability to switch from a complex outsider, as is evident in Boy A, to assertive and brave fighter for truth, as is shown in Red Riding 1974, to a charismatic and sympathetic young businessman, apparent in The Social Network.

Webb and Garfield admit that for inspiration they borrowed some of the ideas from not only the early comics of Lee/Ditko, but also the very recent ones, specifically Ultimate Spider-Man, which introduced Spider-Man to the new century’s generation, therefore the film expands from one period to many other interpretations of Spider-Man. 

Friday
Aug052011

Confidence or Covering Your Ass? Sony Announces May 2014 Release for Amazing Spider-Man Sequel

The Amazing Spider-Man won't swing into theaters for another 11 months. So we have plenty of time to get used to (if you haven't already!) seeing Andrew Garfield in his new web-slinger outfit, Emma Stone with blonde locks and stop asking yourself "Where's Sam and Tobey?"

This afternoon, Sony announced a May 2, 2014 release date for the as-yet-released reboot's sequel.

Does this mean studio heads like they've seen in from Marc Webb & Co. or just counting their eggs before they hatch? Probably a bit of both, I'd say. It's also standard operating procedure to go ahead and announce release dates far in advance and they'll be the first to lay claim of summer 2014 (Jesus, I'll be 30!) So if need be, they can be moved around.

As always this isn't concrete that an Amazing Spider-Man follow-up is guaranteed. I recall Universal announcing a sequel to Ang Lee's Hulk for summer 2006, Warner Brothers doing so for sequels to both Superman Returns (summer 2009) and Terminator: Salvation (summer 2011) and so on. So don't cling to this as anything beyond a studio covering their bases. Yes, the cast is locked down for sequels and James Vanderbilt is writing another one. But it's all moot until the receipts start coming in next July.

Friday
Aug052011

Thor 2 May Have Found Its Director

Television director Brian Kirk, responsible for helming episodes of Boardwalk Empire, Dexter and Game of Thrones, is in talks to direct Marvel's Thor 2, reports Variety.

The trades say his work covering both the fantasy genre and large ensembles was the clincher. Makes sense. Name-drop Game of Thrones to fandom now and they nerdgasm. Saying you're getting the guy who had a hand in its success and God only knows how they'd react then. Same rational as getting Joe Johnston to direct Captain America and Joss Whedon on The Avengers. I get that, and tip my fedora to Marvel for continuing to play the nerd-cred card.

Of course, this is Marvel we're talking about and everyone knows of their notoriety for being tight-asses. Kirk being cheap was probably a big factor too.

Friday
Aug052011

Catwoman In Action!

So the last night I posted the pic of a stuntman doing a run through of the Batpod stunt on the steps of City Hall, then WB released an official photo of Anne Hathway as Catwoman on the Batpod, now Just Jared have these pics of Anne's stunt double doing the stunt as Catwoman!

Friday
Aug052011

The Sitter Red-Band Trailer – Don't Let Jonah Hill Near Your Children

What's taken away from the red-band trailer for The Sitter (courtesy of IGN Movies) isn't even in the movie.

Jonah Hill's routine (long lumped into the "fatty make funny" category) won't be affected now that he's lost all that weight. You might have seen those recent pictures of him on the red carpet but wait till you see the video intro with him and some little kids. His shtick has always been about being a smart-ass with an anger problem and has never been reliant on his waistline as some would think. Good on him for dropping the pounds.

Oh and the trailer itself? Well. It has everything you expect from the glorious red-bands: pussy eating, big breasts, swearing and a new quote for the ages from Sam Rockwell - "Have you ever been emotionally butt-fucked by a friend?" Something for the whole family.

Friday
Aug052011

First Look at (What We're Told is) Anne Hathaway as Catwoman in The Dark Knight Rises

After photos were taken of her on set in Pittsburgh yesterday, Warner Brothers (in a move similar to going ahead and throwing out the premiere unveiling of Henry Cavill as Superman) have released the first official look at Anne Hathaway as Catwoman in The Dark Knight Rises.

It doesn't exactly look like what I imagined the actress would when she was first announced in the role. Not going to fall on the standard "In Nolan we trust..." reply because one, I find that rather lazy at this point (i.e. It's OK to say you didn't like it at first glance. Even if it is something from Christopher Nolan, Internet!) and two, the truth is I always give the filmmakers the benefit of the doubt. I still remember back in early 2000 when those X-Men suits leaked and everyone was freaking out, and the movie turned out fine.

Having said that, no I don't care for this look.