Friday
Jul022010

Two Mad Max Films Being shot back-to-back!

Twitch has revealed that Georgre Miller has plans to not only shoot the Mad Max remake Mad Max Fury Road,  but that he has plans to shoot a sequel back-to-back with that production. The sequel is said to be called Mad Max Furiosa. The films are apparently being shot this way to allow for rapid release.

Not that I was ever really all that excited about the Mad Max remake as it was, now comes news that there's already two in development. Has Hollywood gone completely bat shit crazy or is it just me. I would've assumed before wasting more money they'd wait to see how Fury Road performed before green lighting a sequel. I think what the studio is trying to do though, is have a sequel out before the excitement from the remake dies down.

I mean it's one thing for the current tween phenomenon franchises Twilight or even the Harry Potter films to do this, but why gamble with a property no one's seen or heard from in 25 years! Not to mention the original films weren't really that big a success even for there time. So I have to wonder what genius gave the go ahead on this project to begin with.

Mad Max Fury Road stars Tom Hardy, Charlize Theron, Nicholas Hoult, Zoe Kravitz and Adelaide Clemens.

Friday
Jul022010

Has Benjamin Walker Been Expelled from X-Men: First Class?

Originating from the UKs Daily Mail, rumor has it Benjamin Walker has been handed the pink-slip from X-Men: First Class. The actor was set to play the young Hank McCoy in 20th Century Fox's fast-tracked, Matthew Vaughn-helmed prequel.

Assuming this is legit, what the Hell happened? Long story short, his age is viewed as a hindrance – especially standing next to co-stars James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender as Charles Xavier and Erik Lensherr/Magneto. They’re playing McCoy's teachers, but putting them next to each other they look like they should be sharing a beer together instead. So it was off with Mr. Walker despite the studio's love for the actor.

That is until three unnamed thespians recently screen-test for the role. None of them were said to be particularly good. So now the tide's quickly turned and Fox might actually go back to Walker with a new deal.

First Class has a June 3, 2011 release locked with an August start-date looming. Everything has to be pushed to the 11 in order to make that date. Thus even the most rational of people might lose their composure to get this done on time. This sounds crazy enough to be true actually.

Whether Walker accepts this new offer (He's already being paid for his original deal) remains to be seen.

Friday
Jul022010

Kevin Williamson Is Off Scream 4? Ehren Kruger Stepping In?

The last thing Scream fans want to hear is this (already questionable) fourth installment turning into another Cursed.

By that, I'm referring to the 2005 fright-flick reuniting director Wes Craven and screenwriter Kevin Williamson. It was supposed to do to the werewolf genre what the Scream trilogy did for slashers. With its highly-publicized production woes (restructuring the original plot, throwing out tons of footage with actors whose characters were ultimately written out of the final product, delaying its release over a year, etc.), that didn't happen needless to say.

But it's looking more and more likely the case with each passing news-item of another actor leaving and being replaced by another. And all these talks of on-set rewrites (a normal routine for your average production, true) are only adding fuel to that fire.

Zap2It says those rewrites aren't even being handled by series-creator Kevin Williamson who penned the first two installments and this newest effort. That responsibly is instead planted firmly on the shoulders of Ehren Kruger – no stranger to the franchise having written 2000s Scream 3 (working off a treatment by Williamson).

Furthermore in what confirms the suspicions of our very own Peter Georgiou, there appears to be a conflict over who will be the resident pop-culture centric film geek. Heroes star Hayden Panetierre was set to play that character in the form of Kirby, the sidekick/best friend to lead character Jill (played by Emma Roberts). However Erik Knudsen was among the new actors brought into the production with his character described as the new Randy.

Making matters worse is Panetierre is still a part of the production and her character hasn't been written out. Instead it sounds like she's going from the second-banana comic-relief (i.e. scene-stealer) to just another teenager for Ghostface to gut. She's reportedly pissed over the rewrites.

So I wouldn't be surprised if she vacates her role not unlike Laura Graham just did. Honestly, who could blame her if she does?

Thursday
Jul012010

"The Dry Land" Official Trailer

"The Dry Land" official trailer has been released you can check it out on Apple. For more on the film head over to the Official Site or the Official Facebook Page.

James (Ryan O’Nan) returns from Iraq to face a new battle—reintegrating into his small-town life in Texas. His wife (America Ferrera), his mother (Melissa Leo), and his friend (Jason Ritter) provide support, but they can’t fully understand the pain and suffering he feels since his tour of duty ended. Lonely, James reconnects with an army buddy (Wilmer Valderrama), who provides him with compassion and camaraderie during his battle to process his experiences in Iraq. But their reunion also exposes the different ways that war affects people—at least on the surface.

This moving, taut story of redemption and reconstruction extends beyond a post-traumatic-stress-disorder narrative. O’Nan is heartbreaking as he explores the depths of his internal struggle; Ferrera fearlessly tackles her role of a young wife in turmoil. The Dry Land is about one man’s fight within his own terrain—his country, home, and mind—and his journey to rebuild what he’s lost.


Thursday
Jul012010

It's Official! Andrew Garfield IS Spider-Man!

Well, there's one less iconic hero to be cast (or in this case, re-cast).

Amid the ongoing months worth of rumor and speculation of candidates ranging from Jamie Bell, Josh Hutcherson (Ha! Fuck me!), Logan Lerman and others, we have a new web-slinger, ladies and germs.

Sony has officially announced Andrew Garfield has been cast as Spider-Man for the studio’s reboot. As well known by now, Marc Webb will call the shots behind the cameras and been up to his eyeballs in 3D cameras and web-fluid ever since.

So what about young Mr. Garfield soon to be donning the red-and-blue suit? Well, he's an unknown to the general public. I’ve yet to check out the Red Riding trilogy, but he was good in The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus (Had a brain-fart for a second there) and he'll be appearing this fall in The Social Network. He was also among the finalists reported by THR back in late May.

Everyone's immediate concern appears to be his age. He's actually older than Tobey Maguire upon his being hired by Sam Raimi for the first silver-screen Spider-Man iteration a decade ago. I know. I can't believe it's been that long. When the reboot was first announced, the studio and filmmakers made it crystal clear to everyone. Peter Parker was going back to high-school.

So wouldn't the casting of Garfield (He'll turn 27 this August) risk the character turning into Roger Moore with any sequels down-the-line? That appears that's a moot point. HitFix says the reboot now starts with Webhead as a college student. That's quite the logical move. Issue solved.

All that bullshit aside Garfield's a fine pick. Should be interesting to hear who will fill in for the other roles – especially the identity of the villain.

Thursday
Jul012010

Paranormal Freakout

Remember last year, when everyone had to "demand" for Paramount to release Paranormal Activity in theaters everywhere?  Apparently, some Twilight fans are now demanding that the trailer for the sequel needs to get the hell out of Texas.

Variety is reporting that the Cinemark theater chain has pulled the teaser trailer for Paranormal Activity 2 from several of their Texas theaters due to complaints from moviegoers who saw the trailer in front of The Twilight Saga: Eclipse that thought it was...wait for it...too scary.

Yes, the same audience who camped out at midnight to see a film starring werewolves and vampires was reportedly freaked out by 73 seconds of footage from an actual horror film.

Now this whole thing reeks of a publicity stunt, since the report claims the complaints only came from a few theaters.  I'm sure most theaters are surviving the trailer just fine.  But even if it was just one theater, that's the best kind of publicity a movie trying not to become the next Blair Witch 2: Book of Shadows can get.  Once again, more genius marketing from the Paranormal Activity team. 

Paranormal Activity 2 opens in theaters on October 22nd.  We posted the trailer when it premiered yesterday...but check it out again, if you dare.

Thursday
Jul012010

Updates on "It" and "Pet Sematary" remakes

Two of in my opinion the scariest movies I've ever seen are getting the remake treatment. Both Stephen King Novels It  and Pet Sematary are being given remakes. Screen writer David Kajganich gave updates on both projects in an interview with Stephen King fan site Lijas Library.

As far as Pet Cemetery and his previous involvement he had the following to say:

I should say up front that Pet Sematary is my favorite King novel and adapting it was one of the best screenwriting experiences I’ve had, creatively speaking. In its modern way, I think it is easily the equal of anything in the literary canon by Hawthorne or Poe, so I approached the book as a piece of literature as opposed to a horror concept to be pillaged. It was a pure pleasure.

After I turned in my first draft, Paramount went through a top-down regime change and I was given a new executive who had creative ideas I just couldn’t stand behind. They wanted to appeal to younger audiences, so there was talk of making a teenaged Ellie the main character, and etc. It was really heartbreaking, but that’s how the process works sometimes. The studio was gracious enough to let me out of my contract and the project was dormant at the studio until very recently.

The current news is that Paramount has restarted the process with a new producer and writer (Lorenzo Di Bonaventura and Matt Greenberg). I wish I could tell you something about their approach, or how it’s going, but I’m entirely out of the loop now.

It seems like a real shame that he was let out of his contract, it sounds like he was taking things in the right direction. I honestly don't think Pet Sematary needed a remake, but if it's getting one anyway why the hell is the producer of the transformers films and GI Joe attached to it?

Another classic in it's own right was "It". However I don't mind the idea of a remake here, as an R Rated theatrical release could serve as better representation of the original novel. Kajganich reveals slightly more on where the "it" remake is at as well, and it sounds like for now it's in good hands.

When I heard Warner Bros. was going to give the novel a go theatrically, I went after the job hard. I knew the studio was committed to adapting IT as a single film, so I went back and reread the novel to see if I thought this was even possible, and to try to find a structure that would accommodate such a large number of characters in two different time periods, around 120 pages, which was another of the studio’s stipulations.

Had I not worked with the producers before, I might have been more tentative about trying to pull off such a massive undertaking, but I’d worked with Dan Lin, Roy Lee, and Doug Davison on our original version of The Invasion, and I knew they would fight for good storytelling, and would also give me the time I needed to work out a solid first draft, which they did. They really went to bat for that. We’ve done some tinkering with it and I am just about to turn that draft in to the studio, so we’ll soon know a lot more.

I think the biggest difference is that we’re working with about two-thirds the on screen time they had for the miniseries. That sounds dire, I know, but it doesn’t necessarily mean two-thirds the amount of story. I’m finding as many ways as I can to make certain scenes redundant by deepening and doubling others. To me, this is an interesting process because it has the effect of thematically intensifying the whole, but it can lead to dramatic surprises. Certain scenes I thought would be crucial to the coherence of the whole ended up cut, while other scenes, which were somewhat cursory in the book, ended up being pivotal in the script.

Thursday
Jul012010

Meryl Streep Negotiating For Margaret Thatcher Biopic

When I see Meryl Streep on screen bringing the noise on the acting front, I want to just weep with joy at how solid this classy women is at her craft. She can play funny like a comedian on steroids and turn the dial up on the drama like a teenager who gets her I-Phone taken away. Anything she is attached to, I am attached to.

So it looks like I am going to the local multiplex to see the biopic of Margaret Thatcher. According to THR, Meryl Streep is discussing the possibility of re-teaming with "Mamma Mia!" director Phyllida Lloyd for "The Iron Lady". The film is a biopic about former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Streep would be portraying the famous political figure.

The film is set to start shooting at the end of the year and Jim Broadbent is in talks to play Denis, "The First Husband" if you will. I wasn't a huge fan of "Julie & Julia" but Streep owned the role as Julia Child. I actually forgot it wasn't actually her while watching the film. I had to remind myself, "not a documentary".

Thursday
Jul012010

Marveling At The Past - Elektra (2005)

“I got nothing”

That isn’t a quote from the film.  I mean I literally have nothing to say.  ‘Elektra’ is a film so dull, so pointless, and so unnecessary that I cannot even find a single memorable line of dialogue with which to start my article.

Part of the objective in this series is to partially reconceptualize the Marvel movies, to repair their flaws and dream about something better.  Just in that regard, ‘Elektra’ is at a disadvantage for me.  I cannot pitch a better version of the film because it never should have been made in the first place.  The only reason it was filmed was due to a contract between Marvel and 20th Century Fox which stipulated that if a Daredevil movie was made, the studio would also be obligated to produce an Elektra film as well.  Jennifer Garner knew it would be a bad film going into the project.  It is the only Marvel movie that producer Avi Arad has admitted as a mistake which never should have happened.  The film was literally made in about six months with a minimal budget.  And for the hardcore fans that would be responsible for making the money back, the character on screen was not the Elektra they knew.

If you cast your minds back to my piece on ‘Daredevil’ you will remember that I had a lot of problems with the way the Elektra saga was handled and even though the film was true to some of the basic story beats, it missed the point of what makes the character and her relationship to Matt Murdock work so well.

Where as their love was all too brief in the film, Daredevil and Elektra’s relationship in the comics was one that twisted and mutated into vengeance, anger and betrayal over the span of decades.  After the death of her father, Elektra pushes herself away from everything good that is left in her life to pursue an existence of soul destroying violence and when she finally comes back into Matt Murdock’s life all those years later, it is as something he barely recognizes.  Having only read the comics after seeing the film I expected they would eventually reconcile.  I expected Murdock to break through Elektra’s steely exterior and find the humanity and the love still buried inside.  It never happens.  The most intimate moment they share is when Matt cradles Elektra on the front porch of his house, right before she bleeds to death. 

Even more refreshing is an issue of the comics where Murdock wakes up in a cold sweat insistent that Elektra is alive.  We expect he is right because a) popular characters never stay dead for long, b) Marvel are notorious for it, c) Murdock has those finely tuned super-senses and d) as readers we are still in shock and denial that she has been killed.  The story culminates in Murdock having to dig up Elektra’s coffin to reconcile the truth.  Rather than the traditional empty coffin cliffhanger we would expect, he finds her cold, lifeless body just as he left it in the morgue a little while before.  Murdock breaks down and the reader is sent a very clear message; she is not coming back.

This is entirely appropriate to the story.  The harsh truth is that Elektra was a villain, in the broadest sense.  She had little to no consideration for the lives she destroyed.  She blocked out the people who tried to bring her back to the light.  She becomes the Kingpin of crime’s top assassin.  Right before her death she had accepted a contract to take out Murdock’s best friend and partner Foggy Nelson.  She paid the appropriate consequences of a violent, remorseless life.

To turn around after all of that and bring Elektra back from the dead just never worked for me, regardless of the fact that it was her creator Frank Miller who was responsible.  Elektra is probably the prime example of a pet peeve I have with a lot of comic book characters.  If that superhero is popular they will eventually have to endure a storyline which attempts to kill them off dramatically.  99% of the time they will rise from the dead and go back to business right afterwards as if nothing happened.  What has changed for me as a reader/viewer is that I can no longer invest myself in that character’s mortality.  Never again will I worry that they won’t be able to win the day or recover from critical injury.  Because, in Elektra’s case, there will always be some ninjas just off-screen to sprinkle some magic pixie dust and bring them back to life.

Elektra is still an intoxicating character and any excuse to watch her fight a room full of evil ninjas is what I call good entertainment.  Just don’t expect me to become emotionally wrapped up in it.  That is the problem facing the film.  The other is that the movie cannot even fulfill the simple request of being a cool, brainless action movie.  Maybe if you’ve seen the recent film ‘Ninja Assassin’ you would call that a good thing.  In the case of ‘Elektra’, what director Rob Bowman makes of the film goes completely against the source material. 

When the character was brought back to life, Marvel at least had the sense to admit the implausibility of it and take her into a far more fantastical world of supernatural forces and magic powers.  Rather than slicing through regular New York hoods, Elektra faces off against a ninja army who dissolve when they are felled.  Rather than a gritty crime thriller, Elektra’s story became a wild, ethereal tale about ghosts returning to the land of the living to resume an epic conflict between good and evil which has raged for centuries.  It’s larger than life.  It’s perfect for an action film.

So why do the filmmakers feel the need to pollute to make the movie about Elektra protecting a teenager?  If I were to pinpoint the moment we all collectively decided not to see the film, it would be when we first watched the trailer and realized that is what the movie was going to be about.  Elektra, famed as the sexiest, most savage and untamable character in the Marvel universe, is reduced to the role of babysitter with sais.

The film’s blatant attempts to use the relationship between Elektra and this kid in order to humanize and pacify the former come across as cliché and forced.  The flashbacks to Elektra’s childhood, almost bringing back painful memories of Ang Lee’s ‘Hulk’, feel pompous and pointless.  Though it wants to take the character on a journey of redemption, the film never has the courage to show Elektra in any sort of vicious or malicious light beforehand.  The only target we see her assassinate is some unnamed evil crime boss/businessman (poor old Jason Isaacs who surely has better places to be).  As such there is no journey to take.  There is nothing to redeem.  The Elektra we meet at the start of the film, apart from being completely different to the one I admired from the Daredevil movie, has OCD and a grumpy disposition.  That is what she comes back from.

The struggle to get there is non-existent too because ‘The Hand’, that supernatural and relentless ninja army from the comics, are presented on screen as such bland villains it defies description.  Cary Tagawa plays evil scowling Asian for the billionth time.  Beloved comic villains like Typhoid Mary are reduced to five minute special effect walk-ons.  The character of Kirigi, a huge masked and mysterious, unstoppable and invincible force of nature in the comics is portrayed on screen as an empty space without an inch of menace, intrigue or charisma.

The whole film is an empty space.  Usually even flawed comic book movies (like ‘Daredevil’) have something to recommend them because they are made by people who genuinely love the source material and have at least a basic understanding of why it works.  ‘Elektra’ is a film made out of some stupid contractual obligation by people who neither understand nor care to know what made it successful.  It is not honest enough to recognize what type of film it should be or story it should tell.  It presents a hero we cannot root for, villains we cannot despise and a plot so hackneyed I can’t even synopsize it.

And I have spent far too much of your valuable time discussing it.

Thursday
Jul012010

Joe Manganiello Should Be Superman!

As Originally Reported At Our Sister Site Supermanlives.net

With The Man of Steel still two and half years away that leaves plenty of room for speculation in casting, and in this case time for actors to campaign for the lead role.

The latest name to be tossed out there amongst the likes of Scott Porter and Chace Crawford is the very menacing and imposing figure Joe Manganiello. I'd say it's about damn time someone actually fitting the comic book representation of the iconic character is considered for the role.

Joe who's best known for his character Alcide on HBO's true blood and Flash Thompson in the Spider-Man films,  has recently gone on record saying he'd like to get back into film, especially as a superhero. He reiterated this in several interviews. He wants the role of Superman.

“I’m from Pittsburgh so the Man of Steel — it’s the City of Steel, so that would go a long way back home,” Joe said of his dream of wearing Superman’s red cape.

Talk about perfect casting. Joe's got the right build, height, weight, etc. The list could go on and on. He's our guy hands-down to don the red and blue symbol for truth justice and the American way. To make this even more surreal, he fits the exact criteria Warner Bros is looking for.They'll want someone relatively unknown who has a lot less resemblance Christopher Reeve and more to the actual character himself. I've yet to hear of another candidate to date that embodies the characteristics of Superman as well as Joe.

As it turns out Joe isn't the only one campaigning to land the lead role. Hard core fans have also started a facebook page to lobby for him landing the part.