Thursday
Jan282010

TMT Back At Full Force

I hope you're all still enjoying what TMT has to offer. I'm back for a moment to make an announcement. I know TMT has been in flux the last couple weeks. I've been getting some emails wondering why the articles have been fewer and asking where Movie Moan was. I'm here to address those questions and more.

First, I would like to tell you all that going forward it will be business as usual at TMT. The transition, although bumpy, has finally hit a smooth patch. We have finalized the staff going forward, which Jamie and myself are very happy with. You may have noticed articles popping up written by Matthew Fry, well he is part of our new editorial staff. Joining him on the editorial staff is prized TMT veteran Rob Hunter. We're also proud to have added some talented writers; Jen Mayhew, Eric Sopko, and Josh Figueiredo. Each with their own style and each with their own opinion. On top of that, former TMT writer Michael Martinez is returning. As of now Phil Gee is still part of TMT, but you never know where the wind will take this guy. So there you have it, two editors, and at press time we have five writers. Onward and upward.

In regards to Movie Moan, the plan was to bring Movie Moan over to IESB with Jamie and myself, and that plan is still in effect. We don't have the capabilities locked down yet over at IESB, but you will be able to enjoy it soon. There is a strong possibility that another podcast will be featured over here at some point in the future. Hang on to your hats.

Thank you for your understanding and enjoy.

Wednesday
Jan272010

George Lucas producing a....Musical?!

Heat Vision Blog is reporting that George Lucas is in the midst of preproduction of his next project.   Is it Indy 5?  A new Star Wars?  Nope.  A CGI-animated musical reportedly starring fairies?  Yep!

What, would you rather hear it was a Star Wars musical?

 

No, I didn't think so either.  Although, if a Star Wars musical were to happen, it must star William Shatner in a kickline with stormtroopers.

This top-secret project currently underway at Skywalker Ranch is being directed by Kevin Monroe (TMNT) and was written by Elf screenwriter David Berenbaum.  No word yet on a title or who will be scoring the film, but it will feature musical numbers from a "variety of sources." 

Now, I love a good musical, especially a good animated musical.  Since I think it's safe to assume that this will not feature a Chewbacca power ballad, I'm curious to see how this one turns out.

Wednesday
Jan272010

Sony Imageworks To Effect 'Green Lantern'

According to The Trades Sony Imageworks has been selected to take on the visual effects for Warner Bros and DC Comics upcoming "Green Lantern".

Warner Bros has tapped Sony Pictures Imageworks as the lead visual effects studio on its superhero tentpole "Green Lantern." Overall vfx supervisors on the project are Karen Goulekas ("The Day After Tomorrow") and Kent Houston ("The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus"). Jim Berney ("I Am Legend") will be vfx supervisor for Imageworks.

Wednesday
Jan272010

Is This Really 'Green Lantern' Concept Art?

Omelete has debuted what might be concept art for the upcoming Green Lantern film. You be the judge.

 

 

 

Monday
Jan252010

'Avatar' Too Much For The 'Legion'

 

Weekend Estimates Jan 22nd - Jan 24th

1 Avatar $36,000,000     
2 Legion  $18,200,000     
3 The Book of Eli $17,000,000
4 The Tooth Fairy $14,500,000
5 The Lovely Bones $8,800,000     
6 Sherlock Holmes $7,115,000     
7 Extraordinary Measures $7,000,000
8 Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel $6,500,000
9 It's Complicated $6,190,000
10 The Spy Next Door $4,750,000

Monday
Jan252010

Start Spreadin' the News: Gremlins 3D?

Odds are if you get my stupid joke in the title you are going to be as excited for this one as I am. The folks over at MarketSaw who recently broke the story that Ghostbusters 3 will be released in 3D are now reporting that a "top source," tells them either a Gremlins remake or sequel is in the works and will be filmed in stereoscopic 3D. Don't get too excited just yet though. They caution their readers that it is "in the early stages with lots of hurldes to pass." You can read the full article HERE.

So long as we get puppet as opposed to CGI Gremlins, I can't wait. If there's one thing this crazy post-9/11 world needs it is the cuteness of Gizmo. Leave your comments and let us know what you think about Gremlins 3D and we will keep you updated on any developments.

Saturday
Jan232010

Editorial: I'm With Coco

Note: This is an opinion piece and does not reflect the opinions of TMT, its staff, its editors, or anyone but the author, Matthew Fry.

I want to start by saying this article is a story of success and triumph, not failure. Keep that in mind as you read it.

I’ve been watching Conan O’Brien for longer than I can remember. I grew up with Conan. Conan got me through college. Conan pretty much made my sense of humor into what it is today. In light of his final episode of The Tonight Show I wanted to ring in with my thoughts on the situation.

First, just to get it out of the way, fuck you Jay Leno. But more on that later.

 Now, let us review the history of "scandal," from an entirely biased perspective. In 1991 rumblings began of Johnny Carson’s plans to leave The Tonight Show. These rumors were believed to have been started by Helen Kushnick, Jay Leno's manager as a way to force Carson out. After Carson announced his retirement, Kushnick used her influence at NBC to bypass Johnny’s choice for his successor, heir apparent David Letterman in favor of occasional Tonight Show guest host, Jay Leno. Big Chin would host The Tonight Show for 17 years. Throughout this tenure, despite rising to ratings king in late night television, Big Chin would face consistent criticism for doing so by dumbing down his material to appeal to the elderly and the idiots. Also, he stole bits from Letterman and Howard Stern.

 During this time two very important things would happen. First, in 1993 an obscure SNL writer, Conan O’Brien, would become David Letterman’s successor on Late Night. This young host would go on to develop cult success, especially among younger viewers. He was also met with high critical praise, even winning an Emmy Award

Second, the producer of The Today Show, Jeff Zucker, was named president of NBC entertainment. Despite some early success (primarily in crappy reality shows), Zucker quickly drove NBC from first place to fourth. He has since been described by an anonymous television executive to New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd as “a case study in the most destructive media executive ever to exist.”

Now about five years ago, Zucker went to Leno and said, “Listen, Conan’s the future, how do you feel about retiring in five years and giving Conan The Tonight Show?” Big Chin agreed. I repeat: Big Chin Jay Leno agreed to retire and hand the reigns over to Conan.

Enter 2008. With less than a year left, Big Chin starts to get cold feet about retiring. Instead of doing the graceful, dignified thing, riding off into the sunset, king of late night as Johnny did before him, he starts to shopping around other networks for offers and use that as leverage against NBC. Zucker who is now knee deep in shit due to his failing prime time, now sees a threat to NBC’s late night dominance. Realizing there is no way Conan can compete against two late night legends; he offers Leno a five day a week prime time variety show. If only Zucker knew that within a year, this would be regarded as the dumbest move in the history of television.

Come 2009, Conan premieres strong, but falls in the ratings. It’s understandable. It took Leno three years to establish his base and become first in late night TV and Conan is competing against a legend who is in the midst of scandal (translation: ratings gold). NBC had said many times prior to this that they do not expect Conan to beat Letterman right away. But then The Jay Leno Show lands in prime time in September. Leno serves as a horrible lead in, further hurting The Tonight Show’s ratings. Furthermore, the affiliates start to get pissed because Big Chin does not bring in the ratings at all. His variety show is regarded as one of the great bombs in television history. And Zucker, instead of correcting his mistake and buying out Jay Leno's contract, instead proposes NBC move The Jay Leno Show to 11:35, the time slot held by The Tonight Show for over 30 years, which will then be bumped back to 12:05, making it in essence The Next Day Show. There is a collective groan in Hollywood. Conan refuses the move, rightfully claiming it would do far more to hurt The Tonight Show than him stepping down, which he promises to do before the show is moved. The rest is, as they say, history. Practically every observer has spent weeks tearing NBC and Leno apart for their roles in this. Conan is bought out for 45 million dollars (a lot of which is reportedly going to his staff who uprooted their lives to move to LA). His final show aired last night. And everyone is left wondering, what the fuck went wrong?

  NBC has tried to pawn the blame off on Conan and his poor ratings through Zucker’s newly appointed attack dog Dick Ebersol, head of NBC Sports whose accomplishments include masterminding the failed XFL, losing the broadcast rights to most major sports, and losing 200 million dollars on the 2010 Winter Olympics (before the event has even occurred). But frankly, it is unfair to blame Conan. His poor ratings were at first a reflection of a new host being up against a comedy legend who was in the middle of a very public scandal. Later in the game, Conan had a very poor lead in. While Letterman was being led in by CSI, The Mentalist, and NCIS, some of the highest rated shows in television, Conan had Big Chin’s variety show which was hemorrhaging viewers. Finally, time was a factor. As mentioned earlier, it took Big Chin 3 years to beat Letterman. Conan had seven months. Considering these factors it is very unfair to blame Conan.

 It is easy to blame Zucker and NBC. However, their errors were more errors of stupidity and sheer desperation than anything else. Zucker took the most successful network in television history and crashed it into the ground. He then got out and pissed on the wreckage. Their sports programming has been obliterated, prime time ratings are non-existent, all that NBC had left was their late night programming which had been a milestone of the network for 50 years. To allow Conan to compete against Jay Leno AND David Letterman would’ve been suicide for The Tonight Show. When Big Chin started making threats, Zucker had no choice but to put Leno in prime time. That said, they are correctly summed up as the incompetent morons that Conan described them as (in song no less) Tuesday night.  Zucker had the chance to rectify his mistake. Following the bomb of The Jay Leno Show, neither Fox nor ABC would touch Leno. He would finally be forced into a dignified retirement had Zucker just forked over the cash to buy him out and paid for his mistake. He didn’t. Now NBC is stuck with an aging comedian for the host of The Tonight Show who has no heir, but more on that in a bit.  The point is instead of fixing their mistakes, these morons just made it worse by trying to have their cake and eat it too. So yes, some blame lies with NBC.

However, I’d say the true villain here is none other than Big Chin. This is a man with a reputation of walking over anyone to get what he wants. As mentioned, in 2008 he got cold feet about retiring but knew it was too late. So, Leno, who is now trying to play the victim, resolved to take The Tonight Show down with him. First, the man who prides himself on his easy negotiations and hand shake deals leveraged other offers over NBC’s head to force the disastrous prime time venture. Then once this story started making it big and The Jay Leno Show’s cancellation was imminent, he lobbied NBC both through the press and in person to reinstall him as head of The Tonight Show. For a man who claims to have no agent, he is certainly as Machiavellian as one. All this is from a man who claims to be Conan’s friend. Monday night he tried to give “his side of the story,” in which he portrayed himself as a victim of NBC’s bad decisions. He failed to mention, that he was cutting backroom deals with them throughout their decision making process. A bit hypocritical, wouldn’t you agree? Leno is not the aloof victim he is trying to portray himself as, quite the contrary. He, much like he was in 1991, is a conniving backstabber. It is as Letterman said on Tuesday, you do not announce your retirement, pass the torch on to your successor, and then say to the network brass, “But I’ll be in the lobby if you need me.” It is a classless, selfish act. Much like Jay Leno is a classless, selfish man.

 So what does the future hold? Leno came out of his stampede over Letterman unscratched. One can only hope that in the age of information and 24 hour news networks that this public affair has destroyed his credibility and hurt his ratings. Some how I doubt it. He will return to The Tonight Show on top and probably stay there for awhile. But he is certainly getting no younger. Eventually he will retire for good (probably in 3 to 7 years), and with Jimmy Fallon being young and inexperienced, there is no longer an heir to the greatest franchise in television history. I am reminded of the story of King Solomon. Conan loved The Tonight Show enough to leave it before seeing it moved to midnight. Leno on the other hand continued to stomp his feet and demand he be put back in, consequences be damned. Sadly, Jeff Zucker was not nearly as wise as Solomon and he gave in to Leno. Sadly, he has probably ensured that The Tonight Show dies with Jay Leno in doing so.

As for Conan, I think the future is bright. He now has the chance to create his own show and carve his own legacy at Fox, much like Letterman did at CBS. And make no mistake about it; it is only a matter of time before he signs with Fox. In his farewell speech last night, Conan begged his younger viewers not to be cynical. He said, “If you work hard, and you’re kind, amazing things will happen.” Well, Conan is one of the hardest workers in the industry and he is renowned for his kind spirit, so I have no doubt that Coco is onto bigger and better things, and that is the true story here.  The success story I mentioned earlier. Conan will rise out of this and he will fight another day. The sky is the limit right now, for Conan O’Brien. So, like Conan’s going away montage last night, I will not conclude this article, instead, it is simply to be continued.

Friday
Jan222010

Memo To The Executives: Spider-man Rides Again

 

It’s been pretty interesting reflecting over some of the articles I’ve written in the series recently given that these dead or dying franchises have suddenly sprung to life again and chosen a completely different course of action than the one I pitched.

Case in point; Spider-man.

My initial piece on Spidey desperately tried to pitch a fourth instalment that could pick up the pieces from the third film and get the series back on track.  It was hard enough to come up with something as a bit of fun.  It’s saying something that Sony couldn’t make it work either, and they’re getting paid.  Now Spidey is in worse shape than ever before in my opinion.  The studio is faced with the daunting prospect of starting from scratch, hiring an entirely new crew, getting a script that works, and yet they are still determined to make the same release date they would by aiming for if they were making part 4 with Sam Raimi.  And worst of all, Jamie Williams is making me re-write this article because of all these changes.  Damn you Spider-man reboot, I hate you already.

I will gladly admit that a slightly sadistic part of me wanted Spider-man 4 to be a car wreck.  I’ve been consistently fascinated with the way the series has mimicked the exact pattern of the Christopher Reeve Superman movies.  I wanted ‘Spider-man IV: The Quest for Peace’, just for a laugh.  This is how emotionally un-invested I am in this franchise right now.  But let us deal with the cards we’ve been dealt and try to salvage the situation.

The first thing we have to deal with is tone.  I know with all the rumours flying around right now of Taylor Lautner being cast as Peter Parker that fans may be having nightmarish visions of a reboot that might as well be called ‘High Spidey Musical’; that Sony are so desperate to focus their efforts on attracting a younger audience that any chance of seeing a more mature vision of the character on-screen is fading away before their eyes.  I cannot speak for the studio and have no idea what their vision is.  I will say that with a character as iconic and well known as Spider-man, it seems completely unnecessary to aim for any one particular demographic.  Kids will always be excited about a new Spider-man movie coming out.  Teenagers will see it because it’s a comic book blockbuster and they pretty much know what they’re getting.  The rest of us will see it if its good.

So don’t change the style of the piece purely as a marketing aid.  Do it because it makes sense for the film you are making; because you are rebooting Spider-man, not remaking it.  Although certainly not the best comic book movie made to date, I can hardly think of one which better captured the spirit of a particular era of a character’s run than the first Spider-man film, so infused with the colour and zippy energy of those Stan Lee/Steve Ditko strips of the 60’s.  Which is why hiring Raimi to direct it was the smartest move the studio could have made.  Which is why hiring a similarly unique filmmaker with their own love for the character (and hiring them now while they have enough lead time to shape the film into something they really want to make) is the smartest move they can make now.  Oh, excuse me the phone is ringing.  I’ll be right back.

What’s that Jamie?  Marc Webb eh?  Very clever……….oh, well good for them.

Ok Sony, you‘ve certainly got moving on this, I‘ll give you that.  But there is still time to thank Mr Webb for his time, show him the door and hire David Fincher.  If you were following the development of the hunt for a director of the first film, you will surely remember Fincher’s name was brought up more than once and he was clearly a front runner for the job (almost certainly higher up on Sony’s list of preferred choices than Raimi was).  Fincher was quoted as saying that he turned the job down as he wasn’t interested in doing the origin story, but rather wanted to make a Spider-man movie with the character already established.  Whatever his vision would have been, I doubt the words colourful and zippy would have come to mind.  But he is, not only a highly competent and proficient filmmaker, but also understands how to make commercial cinema.  Hiring Fincher to make a comic book movie would not be the same as hiring Ang Lee and the moment Sony hires him, the fan community not only breathes a little easier but actually starts to take genuine interest in seeing the film.  He is the perfect choice for the job…………well, short of Frank Darabont but then I think he should direct everything.  I’m sure Webb is extremely competent himself.  I’m just not as excited by what he brings to the table.  It does feel like Sony has hired a ‘shooter’ rather than a ‘director’; someone who is quite willing to do what the studio wants in exchange for directing a high profile job which will catapult them into the mainstream.  Maybe it’s the for the best in this case, maybe it isn’t.  Either way, best of luck to you Mr Webb.

I do hope that Webb doesn’t feel the same affinity for the 60’s comic books that Raimi does.  It is time for a Spider-man picture which embraces the darker comics of the 80’s and 90’s.  Even if Raimi’s 60’s inspired trilogy had ended with a bang, I would be suggesting the same thing.  The look of the picture would be set primarily by the design of the Spider-man costume.  It’s wonderful design in the first three films was very much the physical embodiment of the character as drawn by John Romita Snr; bold, meaty, heroic and colourful.  The studio should not be afraid to go the opposite route in a new film.  On the contrary, presenting a totally different looking Spider-man eliminates any confusion outright for the audience that this is indeed a complete do-over.  I don’t know how practical it would be to put the character as drawn by Todd McFarlane on the screen but that is the direction I think they should be aiming for.  Dare to put a Spider-man on the screen that actually looks darker, weirder and slightly unappealing.  Y’know, like an actual spider. 

In retelling Spider-man part one, you are faced with the same problem Warner Bros has rebooting Superman.  Peter Parker’s transformation into your friendly neighbourhood Spider-man following the death of his Uncle Ben and the responsibility he feels for that are as well known (and un-screwed with in comic continuity) as Kal-El’s journey to Earth from the exploding planet of Krypton.  Further more, Raimi told that origin as perfectly as Richard Donner did for Superman.  So although the Spider-man reboot will probably follow the same approach as the recent ‘The Incredible Hulk’ to a certain degree (skipping the actual creation of the character and getting straight to the action), the filmmakers can’t change the origin like in that film because there is nothing to change it to.  At the same time, I don’t think anybody wants to sit through Uncle Ben’s mugging and death again.  Start the story several months after Ben’s death with Peter Parker firmly aware of his powers, if not his responsibility.  The access point for the audience to Parker and those powers would be the kids around him.  As far as they are concerned, Parker is a recluse who has isolated himself because of his uncle’s death and yet rumours persist of his bizarre talents.  Maybe, in a twist on the traditional origin story, Peter creates the Spider-man character for fame and fortune after the death of Uncle Ben, in order to support himself and his widowed Aunt May and to escape from the pain and grief he feels in the adoration of the public.  But it certainly isn’t to selflessly fight crime initially.  If Peter needs the death of someone close to him to be able to fully accept the mantle of Spider-man then don’t make it Uncle Ben; make it Gwen Stacy.

The one problem I had with Raimi’s storytelling approach to the first and second films was replacing Gwen with Mary Jane, all apparently because of his dislike of the character.  Well that would be fair enough except for the fact that the actual character of Mary Jane as played by Kirsten Dunst reminded me more of Gwen Stacy; and then of course they just brought in the character anyway and wasted her.  Looking back on the series, it just seemed a pointless change.  The reboot has a chance to rectify that.  Keep Mary Jane out of the series, at least for the first film.  If the filmmakers want to introduce her then they can afford to be playful about it.  Introduce her exactly as she was in her first appearances in the comics; partially obscured so we couldn’t see her face and all building up to the iconic reveal.  It will get the films the exact same kind of attention and curiosity that ‘Sherlock Holmes’ is receiving at the moment thanks to the hidden cameo appearance of Professor Moriarty. 

In my Spider-man 4 article I mentioned that the special effects needed a drastic overhaul.  For all the kinetic and elaborate sequences of Spidey swinging through New York, it’s all for nothing if it is a CGI cartoon.  I was sort of awestruck to see, after all the great effects work accomplished in the second film (where Spidey’s action scenes were rendered well enough to be credible), the CGI of the third took two steps backwards and became cartoony again.  Sony are probably looking at ‘Avatar’ now and saying that creating a photorealistic Spider-man is quite doable.  But I would really hope that they realise that stuntmen pulling off practical stunts (physically swinging on blue screen and integrating them with live action plates of the city for example), even if they have to scale down the size of the action, provides a far greater rush and sense of satisfaction for the audience.

And as far as the villain is concerned, regardless that we are no longer discussing a sequel to the third film, a still feel very strongly that we need to see something different than the usual costumed loons.  We cannot have a repeat of the Green Goblin storyline.  Doctor Octopus, recast for this film as an out and out evil guy would be great but seem old hat to the audience from a visual perspective.  And so many of the other villains in Spidey’s rogues gallery just don’t seem strong enough to carry a film (I’m looking at you Vulture).  If the story is going to be about, for example, power and temptation then you need a villain that is the embodiment of those things.  As I mentioned in my previous piece, give us a villain in the mould of ‘The Kingpin’ (who cannot be used as Fox still have the rights to both him and Daredevil - though they won’t bloody do anything with them); a ruthless and evil man with no personal connection to Peter Parker, no way to psychologically justify his behaviour or redeem him at the end of the film, but with real power and muscle behind him.  A man whose command over both organised crime and sway with legitimate government and law enforcement makes the odds against Spidey seem insurmountable.  And if you cast Hammerhead in the role, then you have someone with an interesting physical attribute rather than just a common hood who wouldn’t be out of place on the live action Spider-man TV show from the 70’s.  I loved the small, personal and intimate scale of the Raimi’s first Spider-man and how, for all the mayhem, the final battle between Spidey and the Goblin was a clash between a surrogate father and son.  But there is also something to be said for an earnest high school dork who, because of the gift he has been given, has the balls to take on the biggest crime syndicate in the city all by himself.  What Peter Parker is really fighting for are the ideals his uncle stood for and to create a city where such a tragedy can hopefully never occur again.

In conclusion, the real investment I have in a Spider-man reboot is the hope that this time, having learned from their mistakes, the studio will be able to devote the proper time necessary to tell the symbiote/Venom saga properly, obviously once the first film has successfully launched the ship.  I don’t know if you feel the same way I do but with Spider-man, Fantastic Four, Daredevil, Ghost Rider, Superman and, in all likelihood, X-Men, what a bizarre indictment of these comic book properties it is to see so many of them being rebooted barely a few years after their previous cinematic outing.  What is that magic quality that allowed movie series like Bond, Star Trek and Rocky to just crank out a long series of films consistently?  Why does it allude the studios making comic book movies which are more suited for that kind of multiple film treatment than any others?  If they could just get it right all the time, I could have Fridays off and not have to write these ramblings. 

Oh well, NEXT............

Wednesday
Jan202010

MacGruber Trailer & Photo Updates

Click Above Photo or HERE For Photos Courtesy Of Coming Soon

Only one American hero has earned the rank of Green Beret, Navy SEAL and Army Ranger. Just one operative has been awarded 16 purple hearts, 3 Congressional Medals of Honor and 7 presidential medals of bravery. And only one guy is man enough to still sport a mullet. In 2010, Will Forte brings "Saturday Night Live's" clueless soldier of fortune to the big screen in the action comedy "MacGruber."

In the 10 years since his fiancée was killed, special op MacGruber has sworn off a life of fighting crime with his bare hands. But when he learns that his country needs him to find a nuclear warhead that's been stolen by his sworn enemy, Dieter Von Cunth (Val Kilmer), MacGruber figures he's the only one tough enough for the job.

Assembling an elite team of experts--Lt. Dixon Piper (Ryan Phillippe) and Vicki St. Elmo (Kristen Wiig)--MacGruber will navigate an army of assassins to hunt down Cunth and bring him to justice. His methods may be unorthodox. His crime scenes may get messy. But if you want the world saved right, you call in MacGruber.

Coming Soon: MacGruber Red Band Trailer

 

 

Coming Soon: MacGruber Green Band Trailer

 

Wednesday
Jan202010

'Smallville: Absolute Justice' Poster & Video