Monday
Jun212010

International trailer "The Other Guys"

The international trailer for Adam McKay’s upcoming action-comedy The Other Guys has com online.  The film stars Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg as a pair of desk-bound cops who decide to take on a major case and prove they’re as good as the department’s super-star detectives (played by Dwayne Johnson and Samuel L. Jackson).

Detective Allen Gamble is a forensic accountant who’s more interested in paperwork than hitting the streets. Detective Terry Hoitz is a tough guy who has been stuck with Allen as his partner ever since an unfortunate run-in with Derek Jeter. Allen and Terry idolize the city’s top cops, Danson and Highsmith, but when an opportunity arises for the Other Guys to step up, things don’t quite go as planned.

Why is it that the international trailers are always better than the domestic ones? They seem to get the cursing, the extra action, and more crude comedy without any age restriction or warning. If you weren't already pumped for this, you definitely should be now.

Monday
Jun212010

Marvel Developing Short Films

Not that long ago CHUD reported that Marvel had plans to develop second and third tier superhero films on smaller budgets. The films were said to come in the 20-30 million range as opposed to Iron Man 2 which had a budget of 200million. A less risky approach, but still using lesser known characters.

Well now according to Latino Review there may be some validity to Chuds previous report. There sources tell them that instead of going with smaller budgets for full length features, Marvel will likely attach 10 minute shorts before some of their upcoming films already in development.

It definitely seems like a much less risky approach then using even 20-30 million on lesser known characters. They would be able to spend a lot less money, and see what kind of reaction there is to the shorts from the fans. Essentially attaching them to already developed larger hero films will allow them to recoup the cost of the shorts with the gross from said film it's being attached to.

Could this decision have anything to do with DC's latest third tier hero flop Jonah Hex? Hex was made for only 30 million, not including the re-shoots that didn't fix it. But opened with only 5 million. A number that will drop to even less in its second and third weekend. WB/DC will not be breaking even on that one. Hat's off to Marvel for seeing this though, and getting ahead of the curve.

Sunday
Jun202010

Weekend Box Office: June 18-20

Courtesy of Box Office Mojo:

1. Toy Story 3 - $109 million

2. The Karate Kid - $29 million

3. The A-Team - $13.7 million

4. Get Him to the Greek - $6.1 million

5. Shrek Forever After - $5.5 million

6. Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time - $5.2 million

7. Killers - $5.1 million

8. Jonah Hex - $5 million

9. Iron Man 2 - $2.67 million

10. Marmaduke - $2.65 million

Welcome back, summer!

As expected, the amazing Toy Story 3 (which I've already seen twice) took first place this weekend, opening with $109 million.  That's the biggest opening for a Pixar film since The Incredibles opened with $70.4 million in 2004, and the third biggest opening weekend of the year.

Toy Story 3 also took an additional $44.8 million overseas, with further overseas releases scheduled to start after the World Cup ends next month.

Last week's champ, The Karate Kid, help up well, dropping only 47% to earn $29 million, and crossing the $100 million mark domestically.  With schools letting out this week, this should continue to play well into the summer.

The A-Team, which had a disappointing opening weekend, fell to third place, but didn't do badly this weekend, only dropping 46%.  It's still far off from making back its reported $100 million production budget, but it hasn't fallen off the face of the earth in its second weekend either.

Get Him to the Greek continued to perform well with $6.1 million, and Shrek seems headed for that Forever After now that Toy Story 3 is here, rounding out the top 5 with $5.5 million.  Prince of Persia even managed a decent weekend with $5.2 million, although its doing far better overseas with $213 million.  Killers is also hanging in there with $5.1 million.

It was initially thought this weekend's other new release, Jonah Hex, was making a mistake opening the same weekend as Toy Story 3.  Turns out its biggest mistake was existing at all.  Jonah Hex finishes a pitiful opening weekend with a barely noticible $5 million.  The only good news going for Jonah is that it had a better opening weekend than MacGruber

Iron Man 2, which finally crossed the $300 million domestic mark earlier this week, finished at 9th place with $2.6 million.  Its worldwide total now stands at $604 million.

In 10th place is Marmaduke, earning $2.65 million from presumably anyone who couldn't get into Toy Story 3 or Shrek this weekend.

Check back with Mitch when he updates with actuals.  Happy Father's Day!

Friday
Jun182010

Marveling At The Past - Spider-man 2 (2004)

“A guy named Otto Octavius winds up with eight limbs?  What are the odds?”

‘Spider-man 2’ remains, after 20 other films, the pinnacle of Marvel movies to date.  It was made by a unique and passionate filmmaker in Sam Raimi, who was born to bring this source material to the screen and now fully confident in his ability to bring the Spider-man comics of his childhood to life, not to mention the support and breathing room given by the studio to allow him to do so. 

The weaker elements of the first film have been attended to.  Where as the first often felt as if it were being filmed in Hollywood or on a back stage lot, the production design and cinematography of the sequel transports us seamlessly into Spidey’s world of New York and never lets us go.  Where as the Green Goblin wandered aimlessly through the first film looking for something to do, the second gives us a villain in Otto Octavius who has an understandable motivation and a goal to accomplish right through to the end of the picture. 

I love how the character falls into darkness because of advice that he gave to Peter but didn’t buy into himself.  Octavius, on the verge of the greatest energy breakthrough of all time, is too blinded by the success awaiting him at the finish line to realize that the experiment is doomed to fail and cost him everything.  And he is too arrogant to admit his failure when that happens.  Rather than working hard to rethink his fusion reactor from page one, he takes the easy option of stealing money so he can simply build a bigger one.  To quote the man himself, he is brilliant but lazy. 

As well as being a technical marvel due to an innovative combination of puppetry and computer animation which bring Doc Ock’s mechanical tentacles to life, the concept of the character allows the filmmakers to craft some of the most thrilling and kinetic action sequences ever filmed.  In my humble opinion, nothing before or since in any comic book movie has approached the awe of when Spidey and Ock go head to head in ‘Spider-man 2’. 

What I love most about the character is actually something that not everyone bought into.  In order to reconceptualize the character to have a redemptive arc, Octavius’s tentacles are presented in the film as artificial intelligence which take over his mind after the accident which fuses the mechanical arms to his body, also destroys his ability to control them.  In subsequent scenes, Octavius is shown to be actually debating his next move with the tentacles.  Rather than being ridiculous in execution, Alfred Molina completely sells the concept of this warped man.  What makes it click for me is that while the tentacles convince Doc Ock to push on with his obsession and become a criminal, the conversation they have is not too dissimilar from the things people say to themselves to get the same result.  If you want to really look at it from a psychological perspective, Ock is simply telling himself what he wants to hear.  The tentacles have nothing to do with it. 

The second film is epic without being overstuffed, containing the perfect amount of action, keeping its focus on Peter Parker and never forgetting it is a Spider-man film.  The story beats it tells, such as Harry unmasking Peter and MJ making the choice herself to be with him, are so well done they feel logical and inevitable, as if we could see no other way for the second Spider-man movie to be told.  It is also a film with something to say.  The theme of ‘Spider-man 2’ is very much about the gifts we have as individuals and the responsibilities we have to a higher cause to use them, even at the cost of our own selfish needs and desires. 

Finally, the film continues to recognize that, for all his web swinging and spinning, what truly makes Peter Parker a hero are the relatable hard choices he has to make as a human being.  More than any other Marvel movie, ‘Spider-man 2’ puts our hero through the ringer.  Peter must devote himself to fighting crime when he cannot even pay his own rent.  His only avenue of cash appears to be selling pictures of Spidey to the Daily Bugle knowing full well they will be used to further tarnish his public image.  He is trying to ensure a proper life for himself with a proper education but cannot find the time to study.  His love for MJ and decision to not be with her is driving him insane.  His best friend also happens to be the son of the supervillain he accidentally killed.  He risks losing even the love of Aunt May, the only truly dependable, stable element in his life by confessing his responsibility for Uncle Ben’s death.  Oh, and his superpowers stop working altogether.

But ‘Spider-man 2’ is not perfection.  Fan as I am, I flick back through those comics that Sam Raimi grew up on and, just like with the first film, sense a small but vital missed opportunity.

If you cast your mind back to my piece on the first Spider-man film then you’ll remember my long rant on the pointlessness of casting Kirsten Dunst in the role of Mary Jane as well as the redundancy of writing a character with that name yet endowing her with so many personality traits belonging to Peter’s first love Gwen Stacey.  If you’ve been keeping up with the series you’ll know that, in my preferred version of the films, MJ has not yet been introduced and Gwen has fulfilled the role of love interest.  The love story between her and Peter plays out much as it does in the finished product but with the addition of Gwen’s father, police captain George Stacey providing a human face to New York’s finest who have been charged with trying to bring the vigilante web slinger to justice.  The Thanksgiving dinner scene, in which Norman Osborn learns that Parker and Spider-man are one and the same, would have also subtly nodded that Captain Stacey has put the pieces together.

While I think adding Captain Stacey to the first film’s ensemble cast would have helped provide more focus on the city’s police and how they react to the appearance of Spider-man, the main reason you want to introduce him is to kill him off.  In one of Spider-man comics’ finest moments, Captain Stacey was killed while saving a child from falling debris caused by a furious battle on the rooftops above between Spidey and, none other than, Doctor Octopus.  With his last words, Stacey confesses to Spidey that he knows full well who is under that mask and charges Peter with protecting Gwen. 

So imagine our ‘Spider-man 2’.  Imagine Peter’s birthday party reintroducing both Gwen and George Stacey with the latter making subtle nods privately to Parker that he knows full well both how he feels about Gwen and what he really does with his “busy” life.  Imagine Harry Osborn trying to put pressure on Stacey to have the police begin a full scale manhunt for Spidey to avenge his father’s death with the police captain curtly refusing to do so, secretly protecting Peter.  Imagine Captain Stacey showing up at the scene of the Spidey vs. Doc Ock bank/rooftop fight in the middle of the film and being killed, just as he is in the comics.

Just adding that element provides even greater texture to the many story threads of the film.  Stacey’s death shows the agony of choice and fate which dominates Peter’s life as Spider-man in that he was forced to choose between saving his Aunt May or the good captain.  There is never a third option where he can save both and bask in his heroism.  Tragedy must always be endured.  Peter actually begins to believe what the Daily Bugle writes about him and questions whether being Spider-man is a liability to innocent people.  With Captain Stacey’s last words about protecting Gwen ringing in his ears, Peter is only further compelled to give up being Spider-man to honor those wishes. 

Gwen herself, obviously heartbroken over the death of her father, needs companionship more than ever.  She needs someone who will always be there to look out for her.  Peter knows this and desperately wants to be that person but Gwen has already found what she needs in astronaut John Jameson.  Peter is also torn in that he wants to lift the weight from his heart and confess his secret identity to Gwen but this is further complicated being that he will have to also confess his responsibility for her father’s death.  Before the end of the film, it is Gwen who will give Spider-man the strength to fight on by absolving him of that blame.  Also, by having Doc Ock be responsible for Captain Stacey’s death, a proper antagonism is established between the villain and Gwen.  As opposed to her being the bait for the hero, once again kidnapped but some nutcase she doesn’t know.

While the finished film does a good enough job convincing you of Peter’s decision to give up the costume, there was one element that never sat well with me.  For all his issues, I could never believe that Peter would give up being Spider-man if he knew that Doc Ock was still at large.  This is a force well beyond the power of a police force to stop.  If their initial fight at the bank could have established Ock as missing and presumed dead, Peter’s return to normality would have made perfect sense.

But I digress.  You can tell how much I admire the ‘Spider-man 2’ that we got.  It is everything we, as fans, ask for with these comic book movies.  It is a film made with love and passion, with a real story to tell, rather than just a checklist of studio/producer/actor notes of scenes they each want to see stuffed into the narrative.  Please do check back with me in a few weeks time for a very close, and most likely angry, look into the film which magically erased all the good work done to the Spider-man movies up to that point and destroyed a franchise.  But before we delve into ‘Spider-man 3’, join me next week for a look back at a film which fits the exact same description; ‘Blade Trinity’.

Friday
Jun182010

New Green Lantern Poster

For all the hard core Lantern fans out there Bleeding Cool has got their hands on a new Green Lantern Poster/Banner. From the looks of this I'm guessing it's promo art for the upcoming animated series. If that is in fact the case it looks as if they plan to distance the series from the the previous direct to video release, and link it somewhat to the live action adaption.

I'm sure we'll know soon enough though. Comic Con is just around the corner, so expect to hear and hoepfully see a lot more from Green Lantern very soon.

Friday
Jun182010

Benjamin Walker Joins X-Men: First Class? 

 

First reported by The New York Times earlier this week that Benjamin Walker was offered a role in X-Men First Class.

Now Showbiz411 is saying he's in early talks to play Henry Philip "Hank" McCoy (aka Beast) in Matthew Vaughn's X-Men First Class.

I've never actually heard of Walker before, so I can't say I'm excited or disappointed by this. The last and only time for that matter that we saw Beast on the big screen was in Brett Ratner's 2006 pic X-Men: The Last Stand. The movie may not have been a huge success, but Kelsey Grammer did a good job of bringing Beast to life. lets just hope Walker can do the same.

He would be joining James McAvoy, who will play Charles Xavier, and possibly Michael Fassbender, who is in negotiations for the role of Erik Lensherr (aka Magneto).

Thursday
Jun172010

Trailer for "Voyage of the Dawn Treader"

I was happy to learn that the Chronicles of Narnia movie series would continue after Disney dropped the franchise following the disappointing box office of Prince Caspian.  While they were no Lord of the Rings, I had enjoyed both films in the series so far, and having read the books, I knew there were some good stories left to tell.

However, I was not so thrilled to hear Fox would be taking over the series, especially with their downright pitiful track record with these types of movies in the last few years. 

But I'm liking what we're seeing so far in the new trailer for The Chronicles of Narnia: Voyage of the Dawn Treader, which is due in theaters on December 10th.  Returning to Narnia three years after the events of Prince Caspian, Lucy and Edmund Pevensie (along with their bratty cousin Eustace) join Prince Caspian on his ship The Dawn Treader, to find the seven lost lords of Narnia visiting distant lands and having all kinds of adventures along the way.

I did think Eustace, who was hilariously obnoxious in the book, was a bit underrepresented in the trailer, and I'm curious why we're seeing Peter and Susan again, who did leave Narnia for good at the end of the last film.

But, I'm a bit more optimistic about this film having seen this trailer. 

Thursday
Jun172010

The Anderson Chronicles: Superman

In this second edition of the Anderson Chronicles I delve into the behind the scenes happening on what Warner Bros wants in their new Superman. I don't mean the film as a whole, but the character himself, and what they'll be looking for when casting the icon.

I think it’s safe to say that common knowledge on the subject is they plan to steer clear of anything reminding audiences of Christopher Reeve. That isn’t the easiest thing in the world to pull off to begin with. But many, not all though, felt shades of the late actor in Brandon Routh's performance in Superman Returns, and the decision to continue with the movie universe set up by Richard Donner. It might have seemed like a great idea at the time. But Superman Returns ended up being a box office underperformer. By no means is making $200 million in the U.S. and $400 million total worldwide "a flop." But it was not the kind of money everyone felt a character as iconic and well-known as Superman should have earned. Not taking anything away from Routh, but it’s obvious they’ll go in a totally new direction with the reboot.

The one guarantee in casting is that they'll be looking for an American. Superman has always stood for the image of the all American Good Guy. A more common title used for him over the years is the Big Blue Boy Scout. When Superman Returns was released four years ago, there was a big controversy about the absence of "The American way" being replaced by "All that stuff." That didn’t sit well with a lot of regular people who don’t religiously follow the movie-scene beyond wanting to know what's opening on Friday and what looks good. After that P.R. dust-up, do people really think Warner Bros would take the risk of not only losing that again, but then casting a non-American as the Man of Steel?

All you have to do is look at the James Bond movies, and its producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, as an example. The idea was flirted with every so often with going for a Yank whenever it was time to cast a new actor in the role. Aficionados are aware that almost happened twice. One in the early 70s with John Gavin for Diamonds Are Forever and again a decade later with James Brolin for Octopussy. In both cases, wiser heads prevailed and we were all better off that way.

For those suggesting it's not a big deal to go for a non-American actor for Superman, how would they react if an American was cast as Bond? Even if he put on a perfect accent that would fool everyone? Would they still be okay with the decision knowing full well that wasn’t his nationality? No, they wouldn't and if they say otherwise, they’re full of crap too.

The one time an actor not of U.S. nationality was really considered was U.K. actor Henry Cavill light years ago when McG was supposed to direct. Even though he was who McG wanted, notice how Cavill was never reconsidered for Bryan Singer's Superman or the one George Miller was searching for Justice League. On the other hand, notice that Cavill did read for Hal Jordan early on the casting of Green Lantern. He didn’t get past that early stage. But you get what I’m saying. Batman is another character that isn’t a big concern with going with a non-American because Warner Bros doesn't make hundreds of millions of dollars with posters, banners and artwork of the Dark Knight standing in front of the American flag with "Truth, Justice and the American Way" written right on top. This is classic apples and oranges.

If Warner Bros was going to have a change of heart, they would have already done so for the Australian Miller. So trying to use Christopher Nolan being British as a fallback isn’t only to work, guys. Sorry. They're the ones writing the checks to make the reboot and not Mr. Nolan. He’s there to help the new movie on its feet with David Goyer writing. But he's got Batman III to direct and both movies are coming out in 2012. It's obvious of the two Batman III will take the higher priority for him.

What I think is up in the air is how unknown are they going to go to cast the new Superman. Will the "new guy" being as "Who?" as Brandon Routh was? I could see them instead going for someone with a bit more to his resume. A guy who’s been seen mostly on “Guest of the week” roles on stuff like CSI: Canada or Law & Order: Branson. It wouldn’t be out of line to imagine more of a "Oh, That Guy!" actor wearing the red and blue suit this time around. Looking at how crazy it was to cast Captain America and what’s going on right now with Spider-Man, there was plenty of unknown actors on the scene fans haven’t noticed.

Them not looking the part when they walk into the first audition isn’t a big deal either. I know fans always fantasy cast someone, not coincidentally like Cavill, because they already look the part. That can only get you to an early audition. How far you go past that is dependent entirely on your ability as an actor and how much the casting director, studio and director like you. People always forget Christopher Reeve didn't look a thing like Superman when he was first cast. Remember the famous picture of Donner putting shoe-polish on Reeve to dye his hair black and putting pillows under his shirt for his screen-test? His talent won over every single nay-sayer including Donner himself who admitted to first balking at the suggestion of even reading him.

It's safe to assume there is already a list of young hungry actors Warner Bros is thinking about. I'm surprised no names have leaked through the cracks from people like Latino Review, IESB or Deadline Hollywood Daily. But where things are right now, finding the director is the next logical step of action after getting Nolan to produce and Goyer to write. Whoever is chosen as the next Superman, I’m sure he’ll do the character justice. I think we’ll be in safe hands. Let’s just dial it back a few notches and not jump the gun here, guys.

Thursday
Jun172010

Slater, Oldman, and Cook join "Guns, Girls, & Gambling"

Christian Slater, Gary Oldman, and Dane Cook have signed on to star in Michael Winnick’s stylized crime thriller, Guns Girls, & Gambling. A team up I never thought I'd see on the big screen. I could easily picture Slater and Oldman together, but adding Dane Cook to the mix was a shocker for me. I just hope this doesn't turn out like his other non-comedy attempts in Mr. Brooks with Kevin Costner.

According to Heat Vision, “The story throws Elvis impersonators, Indians, modern cowboys, a 6-foot-tall blond assassin, a frat boy, a corrupt sheriff and a prostitute into a chase for a priceless American Indian artifact stolen during a poker game at an Indian casino.”

“Slater plays a normal guy who in a drunken stupor joins an Elvis impersonation contest. Oldman is the contest’s mega-contender, and Cook will play the sheriff.”

Thursday
Jun172010

New International Trailer "Scott Pilgrim"

Universal Pictures has released this new international trailer for Edgar Wright's Scott Pilgrim Vs the World. In the new trailer you get a lot more of an idea of what this is actually about, as opposed to the previous two trailers. 

It's starting to look like the movie that everyone said sucks ass might be hilarious and awesome after all. I think after this Michael Cera needs to stop playing the loser Virgin for a while though. 

Scott Pilgrim opens in North America on August 13.