Search TMT
TMT Founders
Weekly Columns
Contact TMT
This form does not yet contain any fields.

    Entries by Jamie Williams (2045)

    Wednesday
    May222013

    Don Jon Trailer Glides on the Likeability of Joseph Gordon-Levitt

    It's hard not to like Joseph Gordon-Levitt. For an actor of his talent, he seems like a decent bloke. None of that actor-y air of superiority bullshit.

    When he announced plans to write and direct the sex-addiction comedy Don Jon, it was easy to go with him. Yeah Steve McQueen and Michael Fassbender went the dark(er) route with the same subject two years prior. But all those great directors he's worked with must have rubbed off on him. And again, I just like the guy. 

    And what do you know? It looks good.


    Wednesday
    May222013

    Adam Sandler Credits Pact with Satan for Long Success (AKA Grown-Ups 2 Trailer)

    How else to explain his long tenure of America's favorite comedy star? That or we as a nation have awful taste.

     Grown-Ups 2 has an international trailer. Don't ask why (Sandler's comedies aren't typically big draws overseas). Nobody knows. Unless David Spade's head up Kevin James' ass (An image even David Cronenberg would wince at) tested huge in the European markets.


    Wednesday
    May222013

    Delivery Man - Not the Psycho Sequel We Need, But the Vince Vaughn Comedy We Deserve

    If only this gelled with Gus Van Sant's Psycho do-over. 533 kids discover their father was Norman Bates. Follow some of his off-spring as they see what growing up in a single-parent environment did to their father's psyche and their growing concerns if his obsessions with Mother are genetic.

    Alas Delivery Man is intended as a sperm donor comedy, and Vince Vaughn vehicle rolled into one.

    My idea is better.

    Source: Fandango


    Wednesday
    May222013

    New Trailer for The World's End

    "20 years after attempting an epic pub crawl, five childhood friends reunite when one of them becomes hellbent on trying the drinking marathon again.  They are convinced to stage an encore by mate Gary King (Simon Pegg), a 40-year old man trapped at the cigarette end of his teens, who drags his reluctant pals to their hometown and once again attempts to reach the fabled pub – The World's End.  As they attempt to reconcile the past and present, they realize the real struggle is for the future, not just theirs but humankind’s.  Reaching The World’s End is the least of their worries."

    Tuesday
    May212013

    Proof Clark Kent Wears Those Dorky Glasses in Man of Steel

    For some reason, Clark Kent wearing glasses in The Man of Steel was in doubt. Guessing that had to do with Zack Snyder making fun of the traditional disguise. He also said Zod wasn't the villain and look how that worked out for Michael Shannon.

    If you saw the Comic-Con presentation last year, a few choice seconds were dedicated to Henry Cavill walking into an elevator and popping his signature specs on. And if you followed the Siegel/Shuster court-case, you knew it was going to happen. They had to feature anything originating from Action Comics #1 to legally cover their asses for any sequels.

    Still not convinced? Warner Brothers teamed with Warby Parker for a new line of glasses with designs "inspired by the much anticipated film, Man of Steel."

    So yeah, he wears the damn glasses. Probably in the last five minutes.

    Source: Warby Parker

    Tuesday
    May212013

    The New Trailer for The Wolverine

    The intriguing part of The Wolverine is showcased only at the start. Logan (Hugh Jackman) is alone - again. What happened to "I'll take my chances with him!" at the end of X2? What caused the guy who gave up searching for his past to start a new life with his new family to give up and abandon his family? I want to know.

    But that's not what this new trailer answers, let alone is concerned with.

    Besides the Jean Grey cameo (A force-feed plot device since what he and Jean experienced wasn't a doomed romance - nothing more than mild flirtation), nothing feels all that different from the first theatrical trailer or CinemaCon trailer.

    "Based on the celebrated comic book arc, this epic action-adventure takes Wolverine (Hugh Jackman), the most iconic character of the X-Men universe, to modern day Japan. Out of his depth in an unknown world he faces his ultimate nemesis in a life-or-death battle that will leave him forever changed. Vulnerable for the first time and pushed to his physical and emotional limits, he confronts not only lethal samurai steel but also his inner struggle against his own immortality, emerging more powerful than we have ever seen him before."

    Monday
    May202013

    5 Questions with Family Tree Co-Creator Jim Piddock

    TMT had the opportunity to chat with Jim Piddock, the co-creator, writer and co-star of HBO's Family Tree.

    1. What kind of torture did you put yourself through to transform into Mr Pfister?

    Ha. There wasn't any torture for me. But I thought it might be torture for people to listen to a character in a TV comedy, who has a South African accent. Fortunately, it doesn't seem to be.

    2. Why do you think Christopher Guest trusted you enough to co-create his first ever TV series?

    Either because he's a genius or because no-one else was available.

    3. What are fans of Guest's movies going to think of the show, you think? Is it of a similar ilk to what they're use to from Guest? Did it have to fit a certain mould fans might expect from his work?

    I think it should make fans of the movies happy and also reach a wider audience too. The show has the same style and tone of the films and the subject matter and characters are very accessible.

    4. Are you going to be pickier now about the sorts of parts etc you do because of the impending success of Family Tree and your profile in general? Maybe shooting for The Jim Piddock Show next?

    I honestly don't project that far into the future, but if I was to do a show with myself as the central character, it would be called The Mindy Project. Oh, wait a minute...

    5. I see you met one of the stars of Downton Abbey while shooting in the UK. Did you visit the actual place? How was it? Snare yourself a background role?

    Yes, Chris Guest and I did visit the set, which was fun. Especially seeing the cast members from upstairs and downstairs all eating lunch together very cozily in a converted bus during a break in filming. Hugh Bonneville is also an old pal, so I was looking forward to seeing him that day and catching up, but he'd wrapped and gone home about half an hour before we arrived. Maybe he heard I was coming.

    Family Tree airs Sundays at 10:30 PM on HBO.

    Monday
    May202013

    Exclusive Interview With Donovan's Echo Director Jim Cliffe

    TMT had the opportunity to chat with filmmaker Jim Cliffe on Donovan's Echo, his evolution from short films to his feature-length directorial debut, the origins of the project, shooting in Canada and working with stars Danny Glover and Bruce Greenwood.

    1. How much did the success of your short Tomorrow's Memoir help get Donovan's Echo up? 

    Tomorrow’s Memoir helped in the sense that it demonstrated that I had an ability to direct. It won at the San Diego Comic-Con and caught a bit of attention online, but ultimately, it's still a short film, and there's a big difference between that and a financed feature. My goal was to try and make the leap from a short to a feature, so I knew I had to write something worthy enough for people willing to get behind it, and using the short as means of attaching myself as a director. Donovan's Echo was my first attempt at writing a feature (co-written with wife Melodie Krieger), and it became an award-winning screenplay, which was a nice boon. I thought I might be doing something right.

    Because of those screenwriting competitions, we were hearing from producers and companies in LA, but no one wanted to take that chance on me directing. As one director of development told me, "You could have fifty award-winning shorts, but financiers only see first-time feature filmmaker."  So we still had an uphill battle.

    In the end, I brought it to a producer in Vancouver that I'd known for a few years, Trent Carlson (Fido, The Thaw). I'd worked with Trent before as an artist. I knew he and his partners were developing their own projects and probably wouldn’t be interested in producing for someone else. If anything, I thought he might be able to steer me in the right direction. But he liked it, and believed in my abilities.

    2. Did you consider making a feature-length version of Tomorrow's Memoir your first film? If so, why did you decide to nix that in favour of something else...

    Not really. I think the premise would be pretty tough to stretch out over a couple of hours. I was drawing inspiration from things like The Dark Knight Returns – a retired superhero returning one last time. But the approach was to disguise that fact and make the audience wonder who this man is and why he's being pursued. I think you’d have to reveal the truth much earlier in a feature than I did in the short.

    3. Where did the idea for Donovan's Echo come from?

    The idea was sparked by a moment of déjà vu, which I’ve experienced many times. I started thinking this could be something to explore, and discussed it with Melodie (my wife and co-writer), who was an aspiring writer, and asked if she wanted to get involved. From there, we started breaking down ideas, characters, etc. One of the things we came to early on was that our protagonist should be older with a certain amount of life experience and regret.

    4. Was it hard to entice Danny Glover and Bruce Greenwood to do the film?

    Somehow it was easier than I would have ever expected. We're a smaller film (just under $3M), so I didn't have big expectations as far as casting choices. But we had a casting agent in LA and she put some names together for Donovan. We saw Danny's name in there, and something just sparked. He seemed like a very ideal and interesting choice. We put it out to him, and I think he got back in just a couple of weeks and said he wanted to do it. I was stunned. The movie just took a giant leap upwards. Apparently, he connected with the character and equated a few things to his own life, like his background in mathematics and dyslexia.

    From there, we started talking about Finnley, and Bruce came up. Again, he seemed like a fantastic choice. We put it out to him, and he also responded relatively quickly. He liked the script, and was keen to work with Danny. He also has a home in Vancouver, where we’d be shooting.

    For a first-time filmmaker, to get guys like that, it just never really happens. I was very thrilled they responded to the material and were willing to take a chance on me. It’s a fun movie with twists and turns, some humor and heart.

    5. Were you a Lethal Weapon fan? Did Glover share any stories about it or any of his other past hits with you on set?

    I was a huge Lethal Weapon fan, which is mostly where I knew Danny from, even though I've seen many of his other films and knew that he was someone with a lot of talent and range, like his performances in Witness and The Colour Purple. We didn't really get into the LW series much, although we did talk about Wes Anderson and The Royal Tenenbaums. He enjoyed that experience and mentioned that he had just seen Wes the other day. I'm a big fan of Anderson’s films too.

    6. Where did you shoot, and what were the positives/negatives of the locale?

    We shot just outside of Vancouver in a couple of smaller communities, Fort Langley and Maple Ridge. The bridge was even further away. About a two hour drive from where our main production was. All the locations were very ideal, cinematically-speaking. The biggest challenge was that we just had so many – Donovan's house, the hospital, the Manhattan Project, the grocery store, Kit's garage, etc. We had a 20 day shooting schedule which was very tough to fit everything in. You can only do so many setups a day. Most films of our size try to condense and keep it to a handful of locations – I believe we had over 40. We were pretty ambitious, but I think we succeeded in the sense that people seem to assume that it's a bigger film than it is. A lot of that is due to Danny Glover and Bruce Greenwood being attached, but it's also a good looking film. I give a lot of credit to our fantastic production designer, Grant Pearse, and cinematographer, Bob Aschmann, who really raised the bar.

    7. What are the release plans for the film?

    We did a film festival run in the fall of 2011, and had a theatrical release across Canada last February. But, it's just coming to the States now on May 21, which I'm excited about. It'll be available on demand, digital download, Amazon, Redbox, Walmart, and such. We're just trying to get the word out and hope people discover it.

    Donovan's Echo will be available on DVD, Blu Ray and Video On Demand in the U.S. on May 21. Check out their official site for further details.

    Monday
    May202013

    Jonathan Rhys Meyers Headed to a Galaxy Far, Far Away

    Much as they're the selling point, Star Wars: Episode VII won't all be on Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher and Harrison Ford's sagging boobs. Fresh blood is needed to carry on the Skywalker story. And if there's anything J.J. Abrams has a knack for, it's casting (See the Star Trek and Super 8 casts).

    Latino Review reports the first new addition is looking to be Jonathan Rhys Meyers, alum of the Mystery Boxed One appearing in Mission: Impossible III.

    Too early to tell who the Irish thesp would play. He could be the trilogy's new protagonist or a baddie. Who knows? He was excellent headlining The Tudors, Woody Allen's Match Point and soon to be seen on NBC's Dracula. Hey he even played Elvis!

    Saturday
    May182013

    J.J. Abrams' Mystery Box RIP?

    Star Trek Into Darkness is under-performing stateside. Paramount is in spin mode but you can't put a good face on missing your weekend projections by $20 million. Even with the 3D and IMAX add-ons, there remains doubt the 4-day opening can match the 3 day (and change) launch for Star Trek this time back in 2009. This is more Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows and less The Dark Knight to their liking.

    The rest of the summer will be spent figuring out what happened. And while it's easy to place the blame on Benedict Cumberbatch (not entirely unjustified; he's a great actor but like Tom Hardy doesn't have four-quad appeal outside his devoted online fan-base that just plain got overestimated) or the four-year gap between films and call it a day, the real culprit is staring at our face.

    That damn Mystery Box.

    We all appreciate the effort made by J.J. Abrams and his Bad Robot underlings. Going into a big blockbuster with as clean a slate as possible and no idea what we're getting into. The detail to secrecy however is at an OCD level. Christopher Nolan is big on keeping mum too (Fake spoilers ran wild for The Dark Knight Rises). But you have to clue the audience in on basic components like who the villain is. Nolan gets that. Hence they announced Tom Hardy was Bane and moved on.

    Honest question. Had they scored Benicio Del Toro for Khan, would they have kept the "John Harrison" con (No pun intended) going? Or is this about secrecy for the sake of secrecy? Even when it became the worst kept secret online, they still insisted Cumberbatch wasn't Khan. When the film you're protecting from spoiler-predators fails to live up to the Mystery Box hype, you have a problem. Ironically, Star Trek is Abrams' only film to buck that trend.

    He may have left for Star Wars: Episode VII. But this high-profile of a letdown (and following the OK, but slightly disappointing, results for Super 8) makes it doubtful the Mystery Box will be anywhere close to a galaxy far, far away. It's why I remain confident he'll pull it off. Too much is riding on this to allow Abrams to keep playing that game. Kathleen Kennedy will keep her eye out. That's not a bad thing. Abrams has shown he's a filmmaker, like many, who can produce great product with a careful amount of restraint.

    And what of us fans (Read: me) still hopeful they can repair the damage from Star Trek Into Darkness? El Mayimbe is promising a scoop the start of this week on who Abrams and Paramount want for Star Trek 3 (Sounds like Attack the Block helmer Joe Cornish but we'll see). And don't for a second, doubt it won't happen. The studio needs inventory and still reeling from the loss of Marvel and DreamWorks. We'll get a third film; probably by 2016 to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the original series. Sadly with those same shit-for-brains writers.

    Hey, you can't win them all...